Taj Mahal - The True Story

Taj Mahal – A Hindu Temple-Palace

By now you all know through my previous articles, the irrefutable facts and deductive logic which prove that Islam is evil right at its very foundation. It is not a religion, but a means to legalize rape, murder, loot and destruction! Given what I have shown in these previous weeks, no one should have the slightest doubt that the true followers of such a "religion" can only be called dacoits!

These dacoits have looted and raped many countries, but no country can tell a bloodier tale of muslim oppression than India! The muslim dacoits started their rule over India in 712 A.D. with the invasion of Mohammed Qasem and looking at the present situation of our country it still continues on today!

During their rule they looted and destroyed hundereds of thousands of Hindu temples. Aurangzeb himself destroyed 10,000 Hindu temples during his reign! Some of the larger temples were converted into mosques or other Islamic structures. Ram Janmbhoomi(at Ayodhya) and Krishna Temple(at Mathura) are just two examples. Many others exist.

The most evident of such structures is Taj Mahal--a structure supposedly devoted to carnal love by the "great" moghul king Shah Jahan to his favorite wife Mumtaz Mahal. Please keep in my mind that this is the same Shah Jahan who had a harem of 5,000 women and the same Shah Jahan who had a incestuous relationship with his daughter justifing it by saying, 'a gardner has every right to taste the fruit he has planted'! Is such a person even capable of imaging such a wondrous structure as the Taj Mahal let alone be the architect of it

The answer is no. It cannot be. And it isn't as has been proven. The Taj Mahal is as much a Islamic structure as is mathematics a muslim discovery! The famous historian Shri P.N. Oak has proven that Taj Mahal is actually Tej Mahalaya-- a shiv temple-palace. His work was published in 1965 in the book.

Taj Mahal – The True Story

However, we have not heard much about it because it was banned by the corrupt and power crazed Congress government of Bharat who did not want to alienate their precious vote bank--the muslims.

After reading Shri Oak's work which provides more than adequate evidence to prove that Taj Mahal is indeed Tejo Mahalaya, one has to wonder if the government of Bharat has been full of traitors for the past 50 years! Because to ban such a book which states only the truth is surely a crime against our great nation of Bharat.

The most valuable evidence of all that Tejo Mahalaya is not an Islamic building is in the Badshahnama which contains the history of the first twenty years of Shah Jahan's reign. The writer Abdul Hamid has stated that Taj Mahal is a temple-palace taken from Jaipur's Maharaja Jaisigh and the building was known as Raja Mansingh's palace. This by itself is enough proof to state that Tejo Mahalaya is a Hindu structure captured plundered and converted to a mausoleum by Shah Jahan and his henchmen. But I have taken the liberty to provide you with 109 other proofs and logical points which tell us that the structure known as the Taj Mahal is actually Tejo Mahalaya

There is a similar story behind Every Islamic structure in Bharat. They are all converted Hindu structures As I mentioned above, hundereds of thousands of temples in Bharat have been destroyed by the barbaric muslim invaders and I shall dedicate several articles to these destroyed temples. However, the scope of this article is to prove to you beyond the shadow of any doubt that Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya and should be recognized as such! Not as a monument to the dead Mumtaz Mahal--an insignificant sex object in the incestous Shah Jahan's harem of 5,000.

Another very important proof that Taj Mahal is a Hindu structure is shown by figure 1 below. It depicts Aurangzeb's letter to Shah Jahan in Persian in which he has unintentionally revealed the true identity of the Taj Mahal as a Hindu Temple-Palace. Refer to proofs 20 and 66 stated below.

Taj Mahal Story

Akbar Khan´s passion for the story behind the creation of the Taj Mahal is very much evident in his latest historical saga. It is Naushad who stirs the soul with his splendorous compositions. The emotions stirred by the contemplative words in "Mumtaz tujhe dekha, Jab Taj Mahal dekha..." linger long after the movie is over.

It is sad to say though but the film does no justice to the melodious music that it adorns itself with. Akbar Khan has gone to a lot of effort to present a memorable and legendary love story but the trouble is that everything seems too staged to make it a touching romance. Flabby and overlong scenes of evil plotting and rebellion turn it into a bloated historical epic Burp burp.

Aurangzeb (Arbaaz Khan) imprisons his father Shah Jehan (Kabir Bedi) in his palace. A flashback reveals the details of Shah Jehan´s love story with Arjumand also known as Mumtaz Mahal Zulfi Syed as the younger Shah Jehan, Sonya Jehan The major obstacle to the love story is the villainous Noor Jehan (Pooja Batra) who desires for the prince to marry her daughter, Ladli Begum (Kim Sharma).

Yep, you read that right - Pooja Batra plays mother to Kim Sharma. The casting choice looks as odd as it sounds. Batra and Sharma do not suit their roles and their off-key approach to their roles does not help The actresses should have remembered not to pout... They are in a period saga, not a song remix video.

The make-up department obviously could not be bothered to check whether their work is appropriate to the era or not (some of the make-up on any of the actresses look too modern). I´ll give them marks for knowing how to steal the show. Arbaaz Khan´s cameo is upstaged by a planted beauty spot on his cheek It looks like a gigantic raisin that will fall off any minute.

Some of the special effects is iffy especially those galloping deer in the forest. Dear oh dear, the digitised deer looked very lost. I think they wanted to go back to their computer home page. This adds to the increasing suspicion that one is viewing a rejected draft of a Disney romance. Akbar Khan´s treatment reminds too much of a fairytale - how many times do we have to see two lovers skipping towards each other in slow motion?

The Disney influence is most noticeable in the villainous character of Eitbaar Khan (who reminds me of Jafar Khan from Ron Clements’ and John Musker’s "Aladdin"). Eitbaar is a eunuch who is all dressed up in black and has nowhere to go. A croaky and evil eunuch. I have a niggling feeling that the oppressed and repressed eunuchs in today´s India will not be applauding this film anytime soon.

The influence of K Asif´s "Mughal-e-Azam" is apparent right from the voice-over introduction to the theatrical dialogue deliveries. Akbar Khan has tried to equal some of it in terms of grandeur and has given it a darker touch. Some scenes such as the moment when Shah Jehan sits down to eat dinner and finds his son´s head on the tray instead are unintentionally funny but the battle scenes are impressively staged in parts and realistically gory even. The occasionally refined camerawork and dainty photography further compliments the atmosphere of such scenes.

Nevertheless it is the central love story that is such a let down. Sonya Jehan makes a satisfactory debut but Zulfi Syed is more awkward and speaks as if he is reading from a piece of paper. Their characters go through the paces of falling in love just for the sake of it. Khan does romanticise their love story and spells it out with a hundred violins but he fails to bring out the inner nuances of their passion for each other.

It does spark up and the inner magic comes alive towards the end of the film when Kabir Bedi giving a much better performance than Syed portrays the shades of a man gripped by grief and encroaching death. But by then it is too late.